1. Introducción. (26/3)
Jennifer L. Docktor and José P. Mestre (2014)
"Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics"
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 10, 020119
Force Concept Inventory como cuestionario para analizar nociones previas.
La ganancia de Hake como instrumento para medir nivel de aprendizaje.
David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer (1992)
"Force concept inventory"
The Physics Teacher 30, 141
David Hestenes, and Malcolm Wells (1992)
"A mechanics baseline test"
The Physics Teacher 30, 159
Richard R. Hake (1998)
"Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses"
American Journal of Physics 66, 64
2. Dificultades conceptuales en cinemática. (2/4)
David E. Trowbridge, and Lillian C. McDermott (1980)
"Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension"
American Journal of Physics 48, 1020
David E. Trowbridge, and Lillian C. McDermott (1981)
"Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension"
American Journal of Physics 49, 242
3. Dificultades conceptuales en óptica. (9/4)
S Ceuppens, J Deprez, W Dehaene and M De Cock (2018)
"Tackling misconceptions in geometrical optics"
Physics Education 53, 045020
Derya Kaltakci-Gurel, Ali Eryilmaz and Lillian C McDermott (2016)
"Identifying pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics"
European Journal of Physics 37, 045705
Derya Kaltakci-Gurel, Ali Eryilmaz & Lillian Christie McDermott (2017)
"Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics"
Research in Science & Technological Education 35 DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094
Kaltakci, D. (2012)
"Development and Application of a Four-Tier Test to Assess Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions about Geometrical Optics"
Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12614699/index.pdf
Kaltakci, D. (2012)
“Four-Tier Geometrical Optics Test (FTGOT)”
https://www.physport.org/assessments/assessment.cfm?I=90&A=FTGOT
4. Los problemas de los problemas. Novatos y Expertos. Metacognición. (16/4)
Libro de Randall Knight, "Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching"
Alan Van Heuvelen,
"Experiment Problems for Mechanics"
The Physics Teacher 33, 176 (1995)
Problemas ricos en contexto (context-rich):
Patricia Heller, Ronald Keith, and Scott Anderson
"Teaching Problem Solving Through Cooperative Grouping. Part 1: Group Versus Individual Problem Solving"
American Journal of Physics 60, 627 (1992)
Patricia Heller, Ronald Keith, and Scott Anderson
"Teaching Problem Solving Through Cooperative Grouping. Part 2: Designing Problems and Structuring Groups"
American Journal of Physics 60, 637 (1992)
Context-rich Problems
University of Minnesota Physics Education Research - University of Minnesota
Problemas de la vida real:
RELATE: Research in Learning, Assessing and Tutoring Effectively
Education Research Group of Professor David Pritchard
Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT
Real-World Problems
Actividades para generar sentido:
Libro de C. J. Hieggelke, T. L. O'Kuma, Steve Kanim, D. P. Maloney "TIPERs: Sensemaking Tasks for Introductory Physics"
Resolución de problemas:
Alan Van Heuvelen, David P. Maloney
"Playing Physics Jeopardy"
American Journal of Physics 67, 252 (1999)
Jill Larkin, John McDermott ,Dorothea P. Simon, Herbert A. Simon
"Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems"
Science 208(4450), 1335-1342, 1980
Ana Susac, Andreja Bubic, Maja Planinic, Marko Movre, and Marijan Palmovic
"Role of diagrams in problem solving: An evaluation of eye-tracking parameters as a measure of visual attention"
Physical Review ST Physics Education Research 15, 013101, 2019
5. Tutoriales. Educación como ciencia y arte. (23/4)
Steven J. Pollock and Noah D. Finkelstein
"Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics"
Physical Review ST Physics Education Research 4, 010110, 2008
Lillian Christie McDermott
Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to
Student Learning”
American Journal of Physics 69, 1127, 2001
David R. Sokoloff and Ronald K. Thornton
"Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment"
The Physics Teacher 35, 340, 1997
Libros de Lillian C. McDermott, "Physics by Inquiry: An Introduction to Physics and the Physical Sciences"
Libros de Lillian C. McDermott, Peter S. Shaffer, "Tutorials In Introductory Physics"
David R. Sokoloff and Ronald K. Thornton (1998)
"Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula"
American Journal of Physics 66, 338
Manjula Devi Sharma, Ian D. Johnston, Helen Johnston, Kevin Varvell, Gordon Robertson, Andrew Hopkins, Chris Stewart, Ian Cooper, and Ronald K. Thornton (2010)
"Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study"
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6(2), 020119
6. Dificultades con Electromagnetismo I. (30/4)
Jing Li and Chandralekha Singh (2019)
"Investigating and improving introductory physics students’ understanding of electric field and the superposition principle: The case of a continuous charge distribution"
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010116
7. Dificultades con Electromagnetismo II. (7/5)
Eric Kuo and Carl E. Wieman (2016)
"Toward instructional design principles: Inducing Faraday’s law with contrasting cases"
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 010128
8. Construcción, validación y calibración de tests. (14/5)
Adrian Madsen, Sarah B. McKagan, and Eleanor C. Sayre (2017)
"Best Practices for Administering Concept Inventories"
The Physics Teacher 55, 530
- Recursos y repositorio de tests physport.org (AAPT)
- Herramienta Data explorer
- 7 categorías de tests (research validation categories):
- Preguntas basadas en investigación del pensamiento del estudiante
- Incluye entrevistas a los estudiantes
- Con revisión de un experto
- Análisis estadístico apropiado
- Realizado en varias instituciones
- Repetido por otros investigadores
- Al menos una publicación arbitrada
- Nivel de validación (según cantidad de categorías que cumple):
- Los 7: Gold
- 5–6: Silver
- 3–4: Bronze
- 1–2: Research-based
Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, and Robert Beichner (2006)
"Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool Brief electricity and magnetism assessment"
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010105
- 5 índices para validar y calibrar un test:
- Item difficulty index
- Item discrimination index
- Point biserial coefficient
- Kuder-Richardson reliability index
- Ferguson’s delta
Gary A. Morris, Lee Branum-Martin, Nathan Harshman, Stephen D. Baker, Eric Mazur, Suvendra Dutta, Taha Mzoughi, Veronica McCauley (2006)
"Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality"
American Journal of Physics 74, 449
- Análisis de IRC (ITEM RESPONSE CURVE)
